Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Singh, S. K. Articles by Suresh, G. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A Source Study of the Bhuj, India, Earthquake of 26 January 2001 (M_w 7.6)

Instituto de Geofísica UNAM
Ciudad Universitaria
04510 México, DF, México
krishna{at}ollin.igeofcu.unam.mx
(S.K.S., J.F.P.)
Department of Science and Technology
Government of India
New Mehrauli Road
New Delhi, 110016, India
(B.K.B.)
Seismological Laboratory
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91125
(X.P.-C.)
India Meteorological Department
Lodhi Road
New Delhi 110003, India
(R.S.D., G.S.)

Manuscript received 10 October 2003.

We study the source time function (STF) and radiated seismic energy (E_R) of the M_w 7.6 Bhuj earthquake using the empirical Green's function (EGF) technique. Our estimations of the STF and E_R are based on teleseismic P waves and regional seismograms, respectively. We find that the STFs as a function of azimuth have a similar shape and nearly constant duration of 18 sec. This suggests that the rupture propagation was essentially radial. The STFs show a sharp rise in the first 6 sec. The E_R estimated from the EGF technique is 2.1 x 10²³ erg. We find that E_R's computed from integration of corrected velocity-squared spectra of teleseismic P waves and regional seismograms are in excellent agreement with the E_R obtained from the EGF technique. Since the seismic moment, M₀, is 3.4 x 10²⁷ dyne cm, we obtain E_R/M₀ = 6.2 x 10^-5. The radiation efficiency, _R, during the Bhuj earthquake was low, about 0.23. The sharp rise of the STFs and _R = 0.23 can be explained by Sato and Hirasawa's (1973) quasi-dynamic, circular source model with an effective stress of 300 bar and the ratio of rupture to shear-wave velocity, V_R/b,of 0.5. The corresponding estimate of slip velocity at the center of the fault is 156 cm/sec. V_R/b 0.5 is in reasonable agreement with the duration of the STF and the reported dimension of the aftershocks, as well as with the results of inversion of teleseismic body waves.

The observations may also be explained by a frictional sliding model, with gradual frictional stress drop and significant dissipation of energy on the fault plane. This model requires an average dynamic stress drop of about 120 bar and V_R/b 0.7 to explain both the rapid rise in the first 6 sec of the STFs and, along with a static stress drop of 200 bar, the observed E_R/M₀. High static stress drop is a common feature of most crustal earthquakes in stable continental regions. An examination of the available data, however, does not suggest that most of them also have relatively low radiation efficiency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Mandal, U. Dutta, and R. K. Chadha Estimation of Site Response in the Kachchh Seismic Zone, Gujarat, India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2559 - 2566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Singh, M. Ordaz, J. F. Pacheco, L. Alcantara, A. Iglesias, S. Alcocer, D. Garcia, X. Perez-Campos, C. Valdes, D. Almora, et al. A Report on the Atoyac, Mexico, Earthquake of 13 April 2007 (Mw 5.9) Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2007; 78(6): 635 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Singh, S. D. Pimprikar, B. K. Bansal, J. F. Pacheco, R. S. Dattatrayam, and G. Suresh An Analysis of the Mw 4.7 Jabalpur, India, Earthquake of 16 October 2000: Toward Ground-Motion Estimation in the Region from Future Events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1475 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Klose and L. Seeber Shallow Seismicity in Stable Continental Regions Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2007; 78(5): 554 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Iglesias and S. K. Singh Estimation of Radiated Energy Using the EGF Technique: What Should Be the Upper Limit of Integration in the Frequency Domain? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1346 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Jaiswal and R. Sinha Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation for Peninsular India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 318 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2181 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]