|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
University of Wyoming
Laramie, Wyoming 82071
drericks{at}uwyo.edu
(D.E.)
U.S. Geological Survey
Golden, Colorado 80225
(D.E.M., H.M.B.)
Manuscript received 14 October 2003.
Frequency-dependent crustal attenuation (1/Q) is determined for seven distinct physiographic/tectonic regions of the continental United States using high-quality Lg waveforms recorded on broadband stations in the frequency band 0.5 to 16 Hz. Lg attenuation is determined from time-domain amplitude measurements in one-octave frequency bands centered on the frequencies 0.75, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, and 12.0 Hz. Modeling errors are determined using a delete-j jackknife resampling technique. The frequency-dependent quality factor is modeled in the form of Q = Q0 f
. Regions were initially selected based on tectonic provinces but were eventually limited and adjusted to maximize ray path coverage in each area. Earthquake data was recorded on several different networks and constrained to events occurring within the crust (<40 km depth) and at least mb 3.5 in size. A singular value decomposition inversion technique was applied to the data to simultaneously solve for source and receiver terms along with Q for each region at specific frequencies. The lowest crustal Q was observed in northern and southern California where Q is described by the functions Q = 152(±37)f0.72(±0.16) and Q = 105(±26)f0.67(±0.16), respectively. The Basin and Range Province, Pacific Northwest, and Rocky Mountain states also display lower Q and a strong frequency dependence characterized by the functions Q = 200(±40)f0.68(±0.12), Q = 152(±49)f0.76(±0.18), and Q = 166(±37)f0.61(±0.14), respectively. In contrast, in the central and northeast United States Q functions are Q = 640(±225)f0.344(±0.22) and Q = 650(±143)f0.36(±0.14), respectively, show a high crustal Q and a weaker frequency dependence. These results improve upon previous Lg modeling by subdividing the United States into smaller, distinct tectonic regions and using significantly more data that provide improved constraints on frequency-dependent attenuation and errors. A detailed attenuation map of the continental United States can provide significant input into hazard map mitigation. Both scattering and intrinsic attenuation mechanisms are likely to play a comparable role in the frequency range considered in the study.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. B. Morozov, C. Zhang, J. N. Duenow, E. A. Morozova, and S. B. Smithson Frequency Dependence of Coda Q, Part I: Numerical Modeling and Examples from Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 2615 - 2628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Ford, D. S. Dreger, K. Mayeda, W. R. Walter, L. Malagnini, and W. S. Phillips Regional Attenuation in Northern California: A Comparison of Five 1D Q Methods Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2033 - 2046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Clinton, E. Hauksson, and K. Solanki An Evaluation of the SCSN Moment Tensor Solutions: Robustness of the Mw Magnitude Scale, Style of Faulting, and Automation of the Method Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1689 - 1705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Saikia, A. Pitarka, and G. A. Ichinose Effects of Irregular Structure of the Mississippi Embayment on Ground-Motion Amplification Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1448 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Menke, R. C. Holmes, and J. Xie On the Nonuniqueness of the Coupled Origin Time-Velocity Tomography Problem Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1131 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cramer An Assessment of the Impact of the 2003 EPRI Ground-Motion Prediction Models on the USGS National Seismic-Hazard Maps Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1159 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |