Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2004; v. 94; no. 5; p. 1630-1643; DOI: 10.1785/012003218
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Benz, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Frequency-Dependent Lg Q within the Continental United States

Dirk Erickson, Daniel E. McNamara and Harley M. Benz

University of Wyoming
Laramie, Wyoming 82071
drericks{at}uwyo.edu
(D.E.)
U.S. Geological Survey
Golden, Colorado 80225
(D.E.M., H.M.B.)

Manuscript received 14 October 2003.

Frequency-dependent crustal attenuation (1/Q) is determined for seven distinct physiographic/tectonic regions of the continental United States using high-quality Lg waveforms recorded on broadband stations in the frequency band 0.5 to 16 Hz. Lg attenuation is determined from time-domain amplitude measurements in one-octave frequency bands centered on the frequencies 0.75, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, and 12.0 Hz. Modeling errors are determined using a delete-j jackknife resampling technique. The frequency-dependent quality factor is modeled in the form of Q = Q0 f{eta}. Regions were initially selected based on tectonic provinces but were eventually limited and adjusted to maximize ray path coverage in each area. Earthquake data was recorded on several different networks and constrained to events occurring within the crust (<40 km depth) and at least mb 3.5 in size. A singular value decomposition inversion technique was applied to the data to simultaneously solve for source and receiver terms along with Q for each region at specific frequencies. The lowest crustal Q was observed in northern and southern California where Q is described by the functions Q = 152(±37)f0.72(±0.16) and Q = 105(±26)f0.67(±0.16), respectively. The Basin and Range Province, Pacific Northwest, and Rocky Mountain states also display lower Q and a strong frequency dependence characterized by the functions Q = 200(±40)f0.68(±0.12), Q = 152(±49)f0.76(±0.18), and Q = 166(±37)f0.61(±0.14), respectively. In contrast, in the central and northeast United States Q functions are Q = 640(±225)f0.344(±0.22) and Q = 650(±143)f0.36(±0.14), respectively, show a high crustal Q and a weaker frequency dependence. These results improve upon previous Lg modeling by subdividing the United States into smaller, distinct tectonic regions and using significantly more data that provide improved constraints on frequency-dependent attenuation and errors. A detailed attenuation map of the continental United States can provide significant input into hazard map mitigation. Both scattering and intrinsic attenuation mechanisms are likely to play a comparable role in the frequency range considered in the study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. B. Morozov, C. Zhang, J. N. Duenow, E. A. Morozova, and S. B. Smithson
Frequency Dependence of Coda Q, Part I: Numerical Modeling and Examples from Peaceful Nuclear Explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 2615 - 2628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. R. Ford, D. S. Dreger, K. Mayeda, W. R. Walter, L. Malagnini, and W. S. Phillips
Regional Attenuation in Northern California: A Comparison of Five 1D Q Methods
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2033 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. F. Clinton, E. Hauksson, and K. Solanki
An Evaluation of the SCSN Moment Tensor Solutions: Robustness of the Mw Magnitude Scale, Style of Faulting, and Automation of the Method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1689 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. K. Saikia, A. Pitarka, and G. A. Ichinose
Effects of Irregular Structure of the Mississippi Embayment on Ground-Motion Amplification
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1448 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. Menke, R. C. Holmes, and J. Xie
On the Nonuniqueness of the Coupled Origin Time-Velocity Tomography Problem
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1131 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Cramer
An Assessment of the Impact of the 2003 EPRI Ground-Motion Prediction Models on the USGS National Seismic-Hazard Maps
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1159 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America