Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jeon, Y.-S. Articles by Herrmann, R. B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

High-Frequency Earthquake Ground-Motion Scaling in Utah and Yellowstone

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Saint Louis University
3507 Laclede Avenue
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
sooy{at}eas.slu.edu
rbh{at}eas.slu.edu

Manuscript received 24 October 2003.

Velocity seismograms from the University of Utah Seismograph stations are used to quantify high-frequency ground motion scaling for the Yellowstone region and the Wasatch front in Utah. This study uses a data set consisting of over 3000 waveforms from 93 stations and 506 regional earthquakes and mining-associated seismic events that occurred in the years 1995-2001. All events lie within the upper crust with magnitudes less than 5.5. The signals were processed to examine the peak ground velocity and Fourier velocity spectra in the frequency range of 1.0-16.0 Hz. Regression results for Utah are characterized by rapid decreases of amplitude at short distances, which requires low Q and a rapid geometrical spreading g(r) for the forward modeling. Q(f) = 160f^0.75, _eff = 0.05 sec and = 300 bars are selected to predict the excitation terms when combined with the derived geometrical spreading. The frequency-dependent excitation of mining-associated events differs significantly from that of earthquakes because of either an additional attenuation due to shallow source depth or apparent low stress drops associated with the slow collapse of long tunnels. A Q(f) = 140f^0.70 and geometrical spreading less rapid than r^-1.0 at short distance ranges are used to describe the wave propagation distance dependence in the Yellowstone region. The Yellowstone attenuation functional D(r, f) is very different from that of Utah, perhaps because a shallow wave guide in the caldera traps more energy. The Yellowstone excitation spectra were modeled using = 30 bars and _eff = 0.04 sec.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Ortega and M. Gonzalez Seismic-Wave Attenuation and Source Excitation in La Paz-Los Cabos, Baja California Sur, Mexico Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 545 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]