Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2004; v. 94; no. 5; p. 1817-1830; DOI: 10.1785/012003257
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhofer, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Faulting Induced by Forced Fluid Injection and Fluid Flow Forced by Faulting: An Interpretation of Hydraulic-Fracture Microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, Texas

J. T. Rutledge, W. S. Phillips and M. J. Mayerhofer

Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
jrutledge{at}lanl.gov
(J.T.R., W.S.P)
Pinnacle Technologies, Inc.
Houston, Texas 77090
(M.J.M.)

Manuscript received 22 December 2003.

We analyzed precisely located microearthquake data detected during five hydraulic fracture treatments in the Carthage gas field of east Texas. The treatments were conducted in two adjacent boreholes within interbedded sands and shales of the Upper Cotton Valley formation. The microearthquakes were induced within narrow horizontal bands that correspond to the targeted sandstone layers. Events throughout all the treatments show strike-slip faulting occurring uniformly along vertical fractures trending close to maximum horizontal stress direction. These events are consistent with the reservoir's prevalent natural fractures, known to be isolated within the sands and trending subparallel to the expected hydraulic fracture orientation. When this uniform fracture system was activated exclusively, the detected shear deformation, measured as the moment release per unit volume of fluid injected, was constant, independent of various fluid viscosities and flow rates used. Within the base of the Upper Cotton Valley formation, anomalous event counts and moment release occurred within dense clusters that delineate bends or jogs in the fracture zones. The mechanisms are also strike-slip, but the fault planes are more favorably oriented for failure. The dense clusters show location patterns diverging in time, suggesting the expulsion of fluids from compressive fault jogs. Fluid flow forced by the adjacent slip-induced loading appears to initially extend the treatments, but the loading also tends to lock up and concentrate stress at the jogs, as evident by fewer but larger events populating the structures as treatments progress. As a result, effective drainage lengths from the boreholes may be shorter than would be inferred from the seismicity extending past the jogs. These high-moment asperities are similar to dense patches of seismicity observed along creeping sections of the San Andreas fault, where they have been attributed to localized zones of strength or stress concentration, surrounded by larger regions undergoing stable, aseismic slip. This similarity, plus large moment deficits in terms of volume injected, suggests a large component of aseismic slip is induced by the Cotton Valley treatments.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
C. Barton, D. Moos, and K. Tezuka
Geomechanical wellbore imaging: Implications for reservoir fracture permeability
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1551 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. J. Jolley, D. Barr, J. J. Walsh, and R. J. Knipe
Structurally complex reservoirs: an introduction
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
I. G. Main, L. Li, K. J. Heffer, O. Papasouliotis, T. Leonard, N. C. Koutsabeloulis, and X. Zhang
The Statistical Reservoir Model: calibrating faults and fractures, and predicting reservoir response to water flood
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 469 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Baisch, R. Weidler, R. Voros, D. Wyborn, and L. de Graaf
Induced Seismicity during the Stimulation of a Geothermal HFR Reservoir in the Cooper Basin, Australia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2242 - 2256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America