|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of
Columbia University
Palisades, New York 10964
(P.G.R.,
W.-Y.K.)
2 Department of Earth and Environmental
Sciences, Columbia University
New York, New York
(P.G.R.)
For simple theoretical models of an underground explosion, two apparently different relationships between isotropic moment and volume change have been published. We show that there is no inconsistency, because these relationships are based on two different definitions of volume change at the explosion source. We report observations of three 25-ton chemical explosions conducted in 1997 at the former nuclear test site near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan. These show the theoretically predicted decrease of signal strength as the shot depth increases. We argue that the relationship between isotropic moment and volume change proposed by Müller (1973) is preferred.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Gitterman Source Phenomenology Experiments with Borehole Explosions of Special Design in Israel Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1892 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |