Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Electronic Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Halldorsson, B. Articles by Papageorgiou, A. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions

¹ Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
212 Ketter Hall
Buffalo, New York 14260
 (B.H.)

² Department of Civil Engineering
University of Patras
Rio, 26500 Patras, Greece
 (A.S.P)

The specific barrier model, proposed and developed by Papageorgiou and Aki (1983a, b; 1985) provides the most complete, yet parsimonious, self-consistent description of the faulting process. It applies both in the "near-fault" and in the "far-field" region, thus allowing for consistent ground-motion simulations over the entire frequency range and for all distances of engineering interest. The model has been implemented in the stochastic method and calibrated with extended databases of response spectral amplitudes from earthquakes of intraplate regions (mainly eastern North America events), interplate regions, and regions of tectonic extension (Spudich et al., 1999, database). The ensemble average value of a key parameter of the specific barrier model, the local stress drop _L, is 161 bars for interplate earthquakes, 114 bars for extensional regime earthquakes, and 180 bars for intraplate earthquakes. The high-frequency source spectral levels of interplate and extensional regime earthquakes deviate significantly from self-similar scaling. The deviation is most likely caused by the "effective" source area and/or irregularities in the rupture kinematics. We account for their overall effects through a high-frequency source complexity factor, , in the source spectrum of the specific barrier model. As a result, inter- and intraplate source spectra show similar high-frequency levels at moderate magnitudes but intraplate earthquakes have higher spectral levels at the larger magnitudes. The interplate soil residuals show clear signs of nonlinear site response, whereas only slight signs of such nonlinearity are observed for the extensional dataset. The regional models calibrated in this study are in reasonably good agreement with other regional attenuation relationships and provide a reliable and physically realistic, yet computationally efficient, way to model strong ground motions with implications for seismic hazard and risk analysis.

Online material: Strong-motion station and event-station pair information.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. W. Campbell Estimates of Shear-Wave Q and {kappa}0 for Unconsolidated and Semiconsolidated Sediments in Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2365 - 2392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Halldorsson and H. Avery Converting Strong-motion Networks to Arrays via Common Triggering Seismological Research Letters, July 1, 2009; 80(4): 572 - 578. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Parolai, D. Bindi, E. Durukal, H. Grosser, and C. Milkereit Source Parameters and Seismic Moment-Magnitude Scaling for Northwestern Turkey Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 655 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]