Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2005; v. 95; no. 4; p. 1457-1468; DOI: 10.1785/0120040031
© 2005 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cara, F.
Right arrow Articles by Boschi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Role of Site Effects on the Intensity Anomaly of San Giuliano di Puglia Inferred from Aftershocks of the Molise, Central Southern Italy, Sequence, November 2002

Fabrizio Cara1, Antonio Rovelli1, Giuseppe Di Giulio1, Fabrizio Marra1, Thomas Braun1, Giovanna Cultrera1, Riccardo Azzara1 and Enzo Boschi1

1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia,
Via di Vigna Murata 605,
00143 Rome, Italy

The ML 5.4 Molise earthquake of 31 October 2002 caused damage of Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg (MCS) intensity VIII–IX to the small town of San Giuliano di Puglia. In contrast, the other towns in the epicentral area did not exceed MCS intensity VII. Building vulnerability and near-surface geology were suspected to be potentially responsible for the high level of damage. However, early results of engineering studies in San Giuliano di Puglia (Dolce et al., 2004) indicate that vulnerability of the strongest damage [European Macroseismic Scale, (EMS) intensity VII–VIII] zone was not higher than vulnerability of the remaining part of the town (EMS intensity VI). We use the aftershock recordings in the town to investigate the local amplification effect due to the lateral variations of near-surface geology. The waveform analysis shows that in the high-damage zone, where clay deposits outcrop, direct S waves are characterized by a large initial pulse that is a factor of 6 larger than S waves recorded on a nearby rock outcrop, a few hundred meters away. Moreover, the strong S pulse is followed by a 10-sec long amplification of ground motion between 4 and 7 Hz. This frequency band corresponds to the fundamental resonance frequencies of two- and three-storied buildings, which are the most common type of construction in San Giuliano di Puglia. Since the duration of the strongest shaking is estimated to have been longer than 10 sec during the main shock, we conclude that the highly damaging effect in the clayey zone could have been due to the combination of the large initial pulse with time-persistent amplification at the resonant frequencies of buildings.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America