Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2005; v. 95; no. 5; p. 1801-1808; DOI: 10.1785/0120040144
© 2005 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pezeshk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zarrabi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A New Inversion Procedure for Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves Using a Genetic Algorithm

Shahram Pezeshk1 and Morteza Zarrabi1

1 Department of Civil Engineering
The University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152
spezeshk{at}memphis.edu

A new inversion procedure for spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) using a genetic algorithm (GA) is presented. The inversion process proposed in this study starts by running a forward solution for the Rayleigh dispersion equation, with sets of random inputs, to find the theoretical phase velocities. Then, it continues by finding new and better sets of inputs through processes that mimic natural mating, selection, and mutation in each generation. The goal of the GA is to find the best match between the theoretical and the experimental dispersion curves. Therefore, with each new generation there is a better agreement between the calculated output theoretical dispersion curve and the input experimental dispersion curve. To start the procedure, two options are available, either requesting the GA-based optimization process to obtain shear-wave velocities and thicknesses for each layer, or providing the thicknesses and requesting the optimization process to obtain the best set of shear-wave velocities. The GA part of the procedure is fast, stable, and accurate, with several advantages compared to the traditional methods. The strength and accuracy of the proposed procedure are presented through two example problems. We show that (1) the inversion process using a GA results in a good agreement between the theoretical and experimental dispersion curves, and (2) the shear-wave velocity profiles obtained from the approach presented in this study and a downhole seismic survey show a good level of agreement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y.-M. Wu, L. Zhao, C.-H. Chang, and Y.-J. Hsu
Focal-Mechanism Determination in Taiwan by Genetic Algorithm
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 651 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America