Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scott, J. B. Articles by Louie, J. N. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Shallow Shear Velocity and Seismic Microzonation of the Urban Las Vegas, Nevada, Basin

¹ Nevada Seismological Laboratory and
Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering
University of Nevada, Mail Stop 174
Reno, Nevada 89557
jscott{at}seismo.unr.edu
 (J.B.S., T.R., S.B.S., J.N.L.)
² Civil & Environmental Engineering Department
University of Nevada Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4015
 (B.L.)
³ Department of Geoscience
University of Nevada Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4010
 (W.J.T.)
⁴ Energy and Environment Directorate
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P.O. Box 808, L-201
Livermore, California 94551
 (J.L.W.)

Las Vegas Valley has a rapidly growing population exceeding 1.5 million, subject to significant seismic risk. Surveys of shallow shear velocity performed in the Las Vegas urban area included a 13-km-long transect parallel to Las Vegas Blvd. (The Strip), and borehole and surface-wave measurements of 30 additional sites. The transect was completed quickly and economically using the refraction microtremor method, providing shear velocity versus depth profiles at 49 locations. The lowest velocities in the transect, NEHRP D class, are near intrabasin faults found near Interstate 15 and Lake Mead Blvd. Calcite cementation of alluvium (a.k.a. caliche) along the Las Vegas Strip elevates Vs30 values to 500–600 m/sec, NEHRP C class. Our transect measurements correlate poorly against geologic map units, which do not predict the conditions of any individual site with accuracy sufficient for engineering application. Some USDA soil map units do correlate, and Vs30 predictions based on measurements of soil units match transect measurements in the transect area. Extending soil-map predictions away from the area of dense measurement coverage generally failed to predict new measurements. Further, for several test sites the predictions were not conservative, in that the soil model predicted higher Vs30 than was later measured (predicting lesser potential ground motion). Subsurface information is needed to build a Vs30 model extending predictions throughout Las Vegas Valley. A detailed stratigraphic model built by correlating >1100 deep well logs in Las Vegas predicts Vs30 better than surface maps, but again only in parts of the Valley well-measured for velocity. The stratigraphic model yields good predictions of our transect Vs30 measurements. It is less accurate, although at least conservative, when extended to sites away from the transect.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Pancha, J. G. Anderson, and J. N. Louie Characterization of Near-Surface Geology at Strong-Motion Stations in the Vicinity of Reno, Nevada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2096 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]