Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, K. Articles by Wang, A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Predicting the 1975 Haicheng Earthquake

¹ Geological Survey of Canada
9860 West Saanich Road
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
kwang{at}nrcan.gc.ca
 (K.W.)
² Institute of Earthquake Science
China Earthquake Administration
63 Fuxing Avenue
Beijing 100036, People’s Republic of China
chenqf{at}seis.ac.cn
 (Q.-F.C.)
³ China Earthquake Networks Center
China Earthquake Administration
Beijing, People’s Republic of China
 (S.S.)
⁴ Liaoning Province Earthquake Administration
Shenyang, People’s Republic of China
 (A.W.)

The publicized four-stage (long-term, middle-term, short-term, and imminent) prediction of the M 7.3 1975 Haicheng, China, earthquake once generated worldwide fascination. Yet the prediction process has remained mysterious because of lack of reports on real-time documentation and details of how warnings were issued. In the present work, study of declassified Chinese documents and interviews of key witnesses have allowed us to reconstruct this important history. Our findings indicate that there were two official middle-term predictions but no official short- term prediction. On the day of the earthquake, a county government issued a specific evacuation order, and actual actions taken by provincial scientists and government officials also effectively constituted an imminent prediction. These efforts saved thousands of lives, but the local construction style and time of the earthquake also contributed to minimizing fatalities. Evacuation was extremely uneven across the disaster region, and critical decisions were often made at very local levels. The most important precursor was a foreshock sequence, but other anomalies such as geodetic deformation, changes in groundwater level, color, and chemistry, and peculiar animal behavior also played a role.