Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2006; v. 96; no. 4A; p. 1213-1229; DOI: 10.1785/0120050259
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barker, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Improved Focal-Depth Determination through Automated Identification of the Seismic Depth Phases pP and sP

J. R. Murphy1 and B. W. Barker1

1 Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
8301 Greensboro Drive
McLean, Virginia 22102

A new, fully automated processing algorithm based on network beamforming of raw automatic detection data has been implemented to improve the analyst’s capability to identify the seismic depth phases pP and sP, and thereby to improve focal-depth estimation accuracy in seismic bulletins. This algorithm has been tested on data recorded from a sample of 150 subcrustal earthquakes located in the Pamir-Hindu Kush, Hokkaido, and central Honshu seismic zones and has successfully identified candidate depth phases for over 70% of the events analyzed, including some with magnitudes as low as mb 3.75. Several supplemental analyst tools for validating such candidate depth phases identified by the network-beamforming algorithm have also been implemented and evaluated in a preliminary fashion. These include the F detector (Blandford, 1974), which provides a quantitative statistical measure of whether a particular detection has a vector slowness consistent with that expected for a depth phase, and the Pearce (1977, 1980) focal-mechanism algorithm, which provides a means for determining whether the observed candidate depth-phase amplitude patterns across the network of observing stations are consistent with the regional tectonic environments in which the earthquakes occur. Results of the tests conducted to date indicate that the use of these automated analyst tools should significantly improve the confident identification of pP and sP phases for inclusion in hypocenter inversion analyses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. Heyburn and D. Bowers
Earthquake Depth Estimation Using the F Trace and Associated Probability
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 18 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America