Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2006; v. 96; no. 4A; p. 1383-1395; DOI: 10.1785/0120050162
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Motazedian, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Region-Specific Key Seismic Parameters for Earthquakes in Northern Iran

Dariush Motazedian1

1 Department of Earth Science
Carleton University
Ottawa, Ontario, K1S5B6, Canada
dariush{at}ccs.carleton.ca

Strong-motion accelerograms recorded within northern Iran are used to examine the propagation characteristics of shear wave, including geometric spreading behavior, Q-value, {kappa}0, and horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) ratio. These region-specific key seismic parameters are estimated from 259 three-component records of 22 earthquakes with magnitude ranging from M 4.9 to M 7.4 in northern Iran. The geometric spreading follows a trilinear behavior with a strong postcritical reflection from the Moho. The first and second hinges of the trilinear behavior are at 75 and 150 km, respectively. The associated Q-value, based on the vertical component is Q = 87 f1.46. {kappa}0 value for vertical and horizontal components are 0.03 and 0.05, respectively. Because of lack of station-specific site information, the H/V ratio is considered to be a rough estimation of generic site amplification. The obtained region-specific parameters are used to estimate the average stress drop based on three stochastic modeling approaches. Stochastic point-source modeling suggests a Brune stress drop of 125 bars, whereas stochastic finite-fault modeling based on static and dynamic corner frequency approaches suggests a stress drop of 68 bars.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. Boore
Comparing Stochastic Point-Source and Finite-Source Ground-Motion Simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3202 - 3216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. T. G. Raghukanth and S. Nadh Somala
Modeling of Strong-Motion Data in Northeastern India: Q, Stress Drop, and Site Amplification
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 705 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America