Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stirling, M. Articles by Petersen, M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Comparison of the Historical Record of Earthquake Hazard with Seismic- Hazard Models for New Zealand and the Continental United States

¹ GNS Science
P.O. Box 30368
Lower Hutt, 6009 New Zealand
 (M.S.)
² U.S. Geological Survey
Box 25046, MS996
Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80255
 (M.P.)

We compare the historical record of earthquake hazard experienced at 78 towns and cities (sites) distributed across New Zealand and the continental United States with the hazard estimated from the national probabilistic seismic-hazard (PSH) models for the two countries. The two PSH models are constructed with similar methodologies and data. Our comparisons show a tendency for the PSH models to slightly exceed the historical hazard in New Zealand and westernmost continental United States interplate regions, but show lower hazard than that of the historical record in the continental United States intraplate region. Factors such as non- Poissonian behavior, parameterization of active fault data in the PSH calculations, and uncertainties in estimation of ground-motion levels from historical felt intensity data for the interplate regions may have led to the higher-than-historical levels of hazard at the interplate sites. In contrast, the less-than-historical hazard for the remaining continental United States (intraplate) sites may be largely due to site conditions not having been considered at the intraplate sites, and uncertainties in correlating ground-motion levels to historical felt intensities. The study also highlights the importance of evaluating PSH models at more than one region, because the conclusions reached on the basis of a solely interplate or intraplate study would be very different.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mucciarelli, D. Albarello, and V. D'Amico Comparison of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Estimates in Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 2652 - 2664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Petersen, T. Cao, K. W. Campbell, and A. D. Frankel Time-independent and Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model 1.0 Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 99 - 109. [Full Text] [PDF]