Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Electronic Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Castellaro, S. Articles by Bormann, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Performance of Different Regression Procedures on the Magnitude Conversion Problem

¹ Dipartimento di Fisica, Settore Geofisica
Università di Bologna
v.le C.B. Pichat 8
40127 Bologna, Italy
 (S.C.)
² GeoForschungsZentrum
Telegrafenberg
14473 Potsdam, Germany
 (P.B.)

Through an extensive set of simulations we investigate the performance of different linear regression procedures commonly used to convert magnitudes from one type into another one, an operation that also has strong influence on the slope of the frequency-magnitude (the b-value of the Gutenberg–Richter) distribution. It has already been demonstrated that a general orthogonal regression provides the most reliable results. However, questions arise when the ratio between the variances of the magnitudes to be related (the knowledge of which is required to apply the general orthogonal regression) cannot be computed.

We therefore systematically investigate the biases introduced by the classical standard least-squares regressions and the orthogonal regressions (or similar procedures) as a function of the true slope between magnitudes, of the ratio between magnitude variances, and of the absolute variances of magnitudes. We compute such biases through simulations very close to the real cases inferred from the German and Chinese broadband networks.

We observe that for 0.7 < < 1.8 the orthogonal regression under the = 1 assumption performs better than standard regressions. For values outside this interval neither procedure is capable of correct estimates. Therefore it is recommended to estimate the absolute errors and their ratio from empirical data and apply the general orthogonal regression. This requires that a seismological data center publish average estimates of event magnitudes and also their related standard deviations. Regrettably, this is not yet a common practice, thus impeding the derivation of optimal magnitude conversion relations.

Online material: Graphics illustrating the performance of different regression procedures on magnitude conversion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. K. S. Thingbaijam, P. Chingtham, and S. K. Nath Seismicity in the North-West Frontier Province at the Indian-Eurasian Plate Convergence Seismological Research Letters, July 1, 2009; 80(4): 599 - 608. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ristau Comparison of Magnitude Estimates for New Zealand Earthquakes: Moment Magnitude, Local Magnitude, and Teleseismic Body-Wave Magnitude Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1841 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Bormann, R. Liu, Z. Xu, K. Ren, L. Zhang, and S. Wendt First Application of the New IASPEI Teleseismic Magnitude Standards to Data of the China National Seismographic Network Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1868 - 1891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Castellaro, F. Mulargia, and P. L. Rossi Vs30: Proxy for Seismic Amplification? Seismological Research Letters, July 1, 2008; 79(4): 540 - 543. [Full Text] [PDF]