Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2007; v. 97; no. 4; p. 1233-1244; DOI: 10.1785/0120060042
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A Dynamic Study of Frictional and Viscous Effects on Earthquake Rupture: A Case Study of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake

Jeen-Hwa Wang1

1 Institute of Earth Sciences
Academia Sinica
P.O. Box 1-55
Nangang, Taipei, Taiwan 115

Friction is commonly considered an important factor in controlling earthquake rupture. In this work, it is assumed that viscosity is also a significant factor. A strike-slip-type, two-body spring-slider model in the presence of both friction and viscosity is applied to approximate the rupture processes of an earthquake along the fault-striking direction. Results show that in addition to friction, viscosity is also an important factor in controlling rupture. The Ms 7.6 Chi-Chi earthquake which struck central Taiwan on 20 September 1999, ruptured a 100-km-long east- dipping transpressive fault (the Chelungpu fault). Measured and inferred results show that there are differences in physical properties between the northern and southern segments of the fault. Simulation results from a two-body model can explain the differences in displacement, velocity, acceleration, and predominant period between the two fault segments.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America