Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2008; v. 98; no. 3; p. 1067-1084; DOI: 10.1785/0120070154
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic Cycles and Earthquake Predictability on East Pacific Rise Transform Faults

Jeffrey J. McGuire

Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 jmcguire{at}whoi.edu

The concept of a seismic cycle, where the stress on a fault repeatedly builds up over a long period of time and then is rapidly released in a large earthquake, influences studies of both the basic physics of faulting and applied research aimed at estimating earthquake hazards. This hypothesis suggests that large earthquakes might be quasi periodic and that the probability of a particular portion of a fault rupturing twice in quick succession should be low. However, this basic hypothesis has been difficult to verify owing to the long repeat times of the largest earthquakes on most faults. East Pacific Rise (EPR) transform faults are an advantageous location to evaluate the seismic cycle hypothesis owing to their fast slip rates and the moderate size (~Mw 6) of their largest earthquakes. Using surface-wave based determinations of the relative separations between earthquake centroids, I document 16 pairs of Mw≥5.5 events that had overlapping ruptures. The distribution of interevent times for these pairs is tightly clustered around 5 yr (with a coefficient of variation ~0.2) indicating that quasi periodicity may be prevalent for the largest events on these faults. Moreover, I find no pairs of overlapping Mw 5.5–6.2 earthquakes separated by less than 50 cm of elapsed plate motion, indicating that the two basic features of the seismic cycle hypothesis are evident in the timing of large EPR transform mainshocks. I have also confirmed earlier results demonstrating a high degree of short-term predictability of EPR mainshocks by combining teleseismic and hydroacoustic earthquake catalogs. Thus, there appears to be a high degree of both short and long-term predictability on EPR transforms.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America