Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2008; v. 98; no. 4; p. 1781-1796; DOI: 10.1785/0120070082
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deparis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hantz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Analysis of Rock-Fall and Rock-Fall Avalanche Seismograms in the French Alps

J. Deparis, D. Jongmans, F. Cotton, L. Baillet, F. Thouvenot, and D. Hantz

Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, CNRS, Observatoire de Grenoble, Université J. Fourier, LGIT, Maison des Géosciences, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France denis.jongmans{at}ujf-grenoble.fr

This study reviews seismograms from 10 rock-fall events recorded between 1992 and 2001 by the permanent seismological network Sismalp in the French Alps. A new seismic-magnitude scale was defined that allowed us to compare and classify ground-motion vibrations generated by these Alpine rock falls. Each rock fall has also been characterized by its ground-motion duration t30 at an epicentral distance of 30 km. No relation was found between rock-fall parameters (fall height, runout distance, volume, potential energy) and rock-fall seismic magnitudes derived from seismogram amplitudes. On the other hand, the signal duration t30 shows a rough correlation with the potential energy and the runout distance, highlighting the control of the propagation phase on the signal length. The signal analysis suggests the existence of at least two distinct seismic sources: one corresponding to the initial rupture associated with an elastic rebound during the detachment and the other one generated by the rock impact on the slope. Although the fall phenomenon includes other complex processes (fragmentation of the block, interaction with topography, plastic deformation during and after impact) 2D finite-element simulations of these two seismic sources are able to retrieve the main seismogram characteristics.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America