Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2009; v. 99; no. 2A; p. 554-565; DOI: 10.1785/0120080011
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stromeyer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grünthal, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Attenuation Relationship of Macroseismic Intensities in Central Europe

Dietrich Stromeyer and Gottfried Grünthal

GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section Engineering Seismology, Telegrafenberg, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany stro{at}gfz-potsdam.de ggrue{at}gfz-potsdam.de

Two intensity-attenuation models for central Europe are presented in terms of mean relations and probability distributions of their variability. They are based on 14,714 intensity data points (IDP) of 31 earthquakes located in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. The attenuation relations are derived from crustal events with moment magnitudes Mw from 2.4 to 5.7, source depths h from 1 to 20 km, and epicentral distances R up to 400 km. Two different regression techniques are applied to derive the appropriate parameters a and b of the attenuation model Formula . A combined weighted least-squares regression utilizing intensities and distances of the IDP in a direct way provides a=2.80 and b=0.0013. A chi-square regression method for mean intensity-class distances estimated by intensity-level binning gives a=2.95 and b=0.0025. The variabilities in the derived models can be described by normal distributions centered at the mean relation with a standard deviation of about 0.7 intensity units. This specification of attenuation variability is one of the advantages compared with former relations, making both attenuation models especially suitable to be applied in seismic hazard assessments. The two independent models can be regarded as an epistemic uncertainty in logic tree based hazard calculations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. B. Sorensen, D. Stromeyer, and G. Grunthal
Attenuation of Macroseismic Intensity: A New Relation for the Marmara Sea Region, Northwest Turkey
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 538 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America