Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2009; v. 99; no. 2A; p. 897-905; DOI: 10.1785/0120080034
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Böse, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heaton, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

A New Trigger Criterion for Improved Real-Time Performance of Onsite Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California

M. Böse, E. Hauksson, K. Solanki, and H. Kanamori

Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Mail Code 252-21, Pasadena, California 91125 mboese{at}gps.caltech.edu hauksson{at}gps.caltech.edu solanki{at}gps.caltech.edu hiroo{at}gps.caltech.edu

Y.-M. Wu

Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan drymwu{at}ntu.edu.tw

T. H. Heaton

Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Bldv., Mail Code 252-21, Pasadena, California 91125 heaton{at}gps.caltech.edu

We have implemented and tested an algorithm for onsite earthquake early warning (EEW) in California using the infrastructure of the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN). The algorithm relies on two parameters derived from the initial 3 sec of P waveform data at a single seismic sensor: period parameter {tau}c and high-pass filtered displacement amplitude Pd. Previous studies have determined empirical relationships between {tau}c and the moment magnitude Mw of an earthquake, and between Pd and the peak ground velocity (PGV) at the site of observation. In 2007, seven local earthquakes in southern California with 4.0≤ML≤4.7 have triggered the calculation of Mw and PGV by the EEW algorithm. While the mean values of estimated parameters were in the expected range, the scatter was large, in particular for the smallest events. During the same time period the EEW algorithm produced a large number of false triggers due to low trigger thresholds. To improve the real-time performance of the onsite approach, we have developed a new trigger criterion that is based on combinations of observed {tau}c and Pd values. This new criterion removes 97% of previous false triggers and leads to a significant reduction of the scatter in magnitude estimates for small earthquakes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose
The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Seismological Society of America