Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2009; v. 99; no. 3; p. 1691-1704; DOI: 10.1785/0120080358
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovely, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mutlu, O.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Regions of Reduced Static Stress Drop near Fault Tips for Large Strike-Slip Earthquakes

Peter J. Lovely and David D. Pollard

Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Building 320, Room 118, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305 plovely{at}stanford.edu

Ovunc Mutlu

Structural Dynamics Group, ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, P.O. Box 2189, Houston, Texas 77252

We present a case study of slip distributions for the 1992 Landers (Mw 7.3) and the 1999 Hector Mine (Mw 7.1) earthquakes in California’s Mojave Desert. Slip distributions, as determined from geophysical inversion of geodetic, strong ground motion, and teleseismic data, are complex, heterogeneous, and often exhibit linearly tapering or concave-upward patterns toward segment tips, distinctly different from the elliptical slip distributions characteristic of uniform stress drop. Mechanical interaction of discontinuous fault segments fully explains the reduced slip near the southern termination of the Camp Rock/Emerson fault segment of the Landers rupture; however, numerical models demonstrate that such interactions are insufficient to explain slip distributions observed at other segment terminations. Numerical models demonstrate that long (5–25 km) zones of reduced stress drop in the vicinity of some rupture segment terminations can explain the slip distributions for these large earthquakes. Zones of reduced stress drop are implemented as regions of increased Coulomb strength. Slip distributions are improved 30%–70% relative to models with uniform stress drop. Regions of reduced stress drop appear to play a relatively greater role near segment tips at which rupture terminates than near segment tips at which rupture jumps to a nearby fault segment. Similar results are obtained implementing discrete stepwise and spatially linear reductions of stress drop. Plausible mechanical explanations for such zones of reduced stress drop include heterogeneous fault strength or friction, spatial or temporal changes in pore pressure, geometric complexity of the fault surface, heterogeneity of normal tractions resolved on the fault surface, inelastic deformation, and dynamic rupture effects.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America