Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2009; v. 99; no. 3; p. 1720-1729; DOI: 10.1785/0120080293
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sammis, C. G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Dynamic Driving of Small Shallow Events during Strong Motion

Adam D. Fischer and Charles G. Sammis

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740 adfische{at}usc.edu sammis{at}usc.edu

High-pass filtering (>20 Hz) of acceleration records from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, and 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquakes reveals a series of bursts that occur only during strong shaking. Initially interpreted as originating from asperity failure on the Chelungpu fault, bursts observed during the Chi-Chi earthquake were subsequently determined to be a local effect within about 1 km of the seismic stations. Similar bursts were observed at the U.S. Geological Survey Parkfield seismic array during the Parkfield earthquake and were constrained to originate less than 20 m from the instruments. Such small shallow events cannot result from the triggered release of stored elastic energy because rate-and-state friction rules out stick-slip instability on such small, shallow patches. Our hypothesis is that the bursts are not triggered but are driven by simultaneous shear and tensile stresses near the surface during the strong motion. At 2 Hz, SV- to P-wave mode conversion at the free surface produces tensile stresses to depths of 70 m. Where standard triggering releases stored elastic energy and adds to the incident wave field, this new driving mechanism takes energy out of the 2 Hz strong motion and reradiates it at high frequencies. It is thus an attenuation mechanism that we estimate can contribute 3% to the net attenuation in the very shallow crust.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. H. Sleep
Depth of Rock Damage from Strong Seismic Ground Motions near the 2004 Parkfield Mainshock
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 3067 - 3076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America